Physical
Theatre and its Discontents
by
Paul Davies
Reproduced from Staging Wales, ed. Anna-Marie Taylor (University
of Wales Press, 1997)
Volcano is a national and international touring theatre company. The
artistic directors are graduates of the University Wales Swansea and
the designer and technical director was born and educated in Neath.
Their work has not focused on the 'problem of Welshness identity, division,
unity, past, present or future. One consequence of this is that itmight
be said that Volcano has made little impact within the Principality.'
Nevertheless the work has been widely seen outside of Wales, in Hong
Kong, Greece, Spain, Macedonia, Germany, Montenegro, France, Italy,
Russia, Holland . . . At the same time, Cardiff, in particular, and
to a lesser extent Swansea, Aberystwyth and Builth Wells, have remained
vital platforms for the development and promotion of the work of Volcano.
Indeed Volcano were probably one of the first Welsh companies to play
at the newly opened Taliesin Arts Centre in Swansea in 1983.
Adapting
the work of Steven Berkoff and Jonathan Moore provided the basis for
the early touring success. The 1980s were a difficult decade. Conservative
politics had not yet targeted the cultural infrastructure within Wales
and Great Britain as whole. Thatcherism had older scores to settle.
As a young Anglo-Welsh theatre company rooted in a dissident, sometimes
Marxist, sometimes oppositional, sometimes just bloody-minded tradition,
it appeared to us that Welsh theatre was curiously unprepared for the
challenge that Thatcher's modernizing rhetoric posed. Culture and the
place of theatre within that awkward claim does not just go on; it gets
redefined, left behind, obliterated, the subject of doctorates and so
on.
Just
what happened to the culture of theatre in Britain in the 1980s is perhaps
a story that remains to be told. Certainly the success of New Right
ideology and the collapse of the Communist utopia signalled the end
of one way of looking at, and living in, the world. Radical rethinking
of a Marxist and non-Marxist hue declared that we were now living in
'new times'.
The
old definitions would not do and various attempts were made to. reinvigorate
our political, social, sexual and cultural vocabularies. Whilst it is
too early to say how successful any of this rethinking has been, it
cannot be doubted that postmodern theory casts a long shadow over all
modern strategies for change.
Furthermore
it would be a mistake to see these developments as purely narrow, academic
concerns. The collapse of political, and to a lesser extent experimental,
theatre can be viewed within the context of the triumph of the market
and postmodern excess. Of course the situation is more fluid than this
account suggests. Rearguard battles were fought, but whatever the outcome
of particular struggles, it was clear that the 1980s were a critical
decade for culture and capitalism in Wales. There was, for example,
within funding bodies (and this to some extent remains true) a crisis
of definition. Were they funding new work on the basis of old criteria
or old work on the basis of insufficiently articulated new criteria?
It
was from within this particular historical conjunction that Volcano
developed as one of Britain's foremost proponents of physical theatre.
The term physical theatre is imprecise. Volcano have not sought to articulate,
or represent, an essentialized account of this new school of performance.
We are historical animals and whatever the seductive charms of naturalism,
theatre has always been, in some senses, physical. Nevertheless there
was within Volcano the feeling that theatre had, unfortunately, turned
its back on what was an increasingly complex political situation. And
here the emphasis was on an expanded definition of the political. Sexual
politics were now at the very centre of both our theatre practice and
our imaginary speculations as to how we might live.There was in addition
the problem of the text, the author and the audience.
We
needed to use movement and words to break through what we considered
to be irrelevant patterns of performance and inherited patterns of response.
In a very obvious way this was theatre that was young, angry and urgent.
However, beyond this immediate response Volcano had chosen their material
carefully. The concern was to unlock the modern/ postmodern debate in
ways that revealed new and unexpected theatrical possibilities.
Combining
movement and text, dynamic and exhilarating versions of Tony Harrison's
V, Medea: Sex War, Shakespeare's sonnets (L.O.VE.) and the Communist
Manifesto were produced. The focus of these productions was in some
senses the same. Volcano sought to disturb and sometimes destroy the
classics (ancient and modern), to suggest that the tradition - be it
political, cultural or sexual - is not so smooth, not so seamless. More
recently we have examined the legacy of Ibsen in How to Live, the influence
of Nietzsche and Baudrillard in After the Orgy and Chekhov's Three Sisters
in our post-Tarrantino, post-feminist thriller, Vagina Dentata. The
belief has been both that a truly contemporary theatre-must draw on
a variety of sources and that the market system of production, exchange
and ideology is differentiated but universal. The Anglo-Welsh experience
can be seen within the logic of late twentieth century capitalism.
The
vexed problems of nations, states and identities have not been addressed.
Rather, Volcano have sought to reinvigorate theatre, reminding us of
theatre's popular, even Dionysian, potential. The enemy here is, on
the one hand, the complacency that surrounds much of our theatre practice;
and on the other developing systems of technology that may render the
culture of theatre an increasingly formal thing of the past.
This
scenario is not doom-laden, although we have our problems in Wales.
Foremost among these are: a coagulation of theatre, its practitioners
and funders around Cardiff (although 1 would say that, as Volcano are
based in Swansea!), a slender base for the production and touring of
work within Wales and lastly a culture that when in retreat prefers
the past to the present and the known to the unknown.
But
these things change. Certainly our experience over the last ten years
in Wales has seen the development of a more flexible approach to the
problems, a willingness to discuss them - and sometimes even to do something
about them! Diversity in theatre seems to us to be more of a healthy
sign than some kind of national style or characteristic and as the end
of the century approaches we seem to have more of the former than the
latter. Whether the current situation reflects the policy of arts councils
and the practice of artists is another matter. The profound challenge
that the 'happy consciousness' of postmodernity offers to artists and
funders alike seems, as yet, to have provoked little in the way of practical
or theoretical response.
Our
own intentions remain the same: to move between Wales and Europe, to
find ourselves somewhere in the middle, on the edge perhaps off the
map. In this vein we have planned a production of Dylan Thomas's Under
Milk Wood with Welsh, Albanian and English actors and a Croatian director.
But, wait a moment, we can't get the rights, they (who are they?) are
performing it at the National. Oh well that's different isn't it, see
...
Note:
Although the recent success of Frantic Assembly, who have worked with
Volcano, and are recipients of ACW project funding does not bear out
this claim.